Life insu­rance company bails out after vaccine death because „volun­tary vacci­na­tion with expe­ri­mental vaccine“ counts like suicide!

Bild: Shutterstock

Life insu­rance company bails out after vaccine death as „volun­tary vacci­na­tion with expe­ri­mental vaccine“ counts as suicide!

The case is curr­ently causing a stir and sensa­tion in France. A rich, elderly Pari­sian busi­nessman from Versailles, who has taken out many life insu­rance poli­cies (worth millions) for the benefit of his children and grand­children, dies from a Covid vacci­na­tion (not disputed by the doctors or his life insu­rers). But then comes the hammer: the insu­rance company does not pay the premium, because the deceased acted at his own risk in the Corona vaccination.

Taking an expe­ri­mental injec­tion with fatal conse­quences is like suicide

The insu­rance company refused to pay out the premium to the family because the policy expli­citly excludes the use of expe­ri­mental drugs and treat­ments (inclu­ding the Corona vacci­na­tion). Conse­quently, the family sues the insu­rance company, but loses. The judge states:

„The side effects of the expe­ri­mental vaccine are publi­cized, and the deceased could not claim not to have known about them when he volun­t­a­rily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that forced him to be vacci­nated. Ther­e­fore, his death is essen­ti­ally suicide.“ 

This leaves the Versche­rung doubly „fine“ because suicide is also excluded from the Polizze.

Here is the verdict summa­rized mutatis mutandis:

„The court reco­gnizes the insurer’s clas­si­fi­ca­tion of parti­ci­pa­tion in the phase three expe­ri­ment, the proven harm­less­ness of which is not given, in view of the announced side effects, inclu­ding death, as legally taking a lethal risk volun­t­a­rily, which is not covered by the policy and is legally reco­gnized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is reco­gnized as well-founded and contrac­tually justi­fied because this publicly disc­losed taking of a fatal risk is legally reco­gnized as suicide because the customer was noti­fied and agreed to volun­t­a­rily take the risk of death without being required or coerced to do so.“

Vaccine deaths soon to be counted as suicides?

Conse­quently, the now death after vacci­na­tion will be considered as suicide by the courts (at least in France)! Insu­rers will now start to pay back life insu­rance poli­cies on a large scale, since taking a fatal risk by vacci­na­tion will de facto exclude them from the contract, making it void. Unima­gined also are the conse­quences for loans with banks, etc. So far, nothing has been heard of this scan­da­lous case in the French main­stream media.

The family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, made the case public on social media.

US life insu­rance compa­nies deny similar cases

Similar stories have already been reported from the U.S. here:
„Life insu­rance compa­nies may deny payouts for vacci­nated people because Covid vaccines consti­tute ‚medical experiments.‘“
Life insu­rance compa­nies there, however, denied corre­spon­ding reports from injured parties.
„The fact is that life insu­rers do not consider whether or not a poli­cy­holder received a COVID vaccine when deci­ding whether to pay a claim,“ said Paul Graham, senior vice presi­dent for policy deve­lo­p­ment at the American Council of Life Insurers .

„Life insu­rance contracts are very clear about how poli­cies work and what reasons, if any, can lead to a denial of bene­fits. A vaccine against COVID-19 is not one of them. The under­wri­ting evalua­tion of an applicant’s insu­ra­bi­lity is not affected by the individual’s vacci­na­tion status.“

However, these state­ments were made only after cases similar to the one in France were publi­cized and labeled as „fake news.“ Thus, the claims of the injured parties stand against those of the insu­rance companies.

Editor’s comment:

For the sake of order, it should be mentioned that upon request, the dome­stic (Germany, Austria) insu­rance compa­nies promise not to make bene­fits depen­dent on the respec­tive vacci­na­tion status, both as far as vacci­nated and unvac­ci­nated people are concerned.

Demands to disad­van­tage the unvac­ci­nated in terms of costs in case of hospi­ta­liza­tion, on the other hand, are made by corona shar­pe­ners, as ever­yone knows.

The infor­ma­tion from France here in the article refers to the source we mentioned and to infor­ma­tion from Nicole Delé­pine, former head of the pedia­tric cancer depart­ment at the Assis­tance Publique-Hôpi­taux de Paris, on the website Riposte Laïque.

5 Kommentare

  1. The article fails to mention that vaccines curr­ently approved and used world-wide, inclu­ding in the EU and the US, have nothing to do with phase-three expe­ri­mental vaccines that are involved in this case.

    • All these C‑vaccines are curr­ently still in this expe­ri­mental phase. They only have emer­gency use autho­riza­tion. Check it.

      • emer­gency use autho­riza­tion is still autho­riza­tion in the US, there is no more data coll­ec­tion etc to do at this phase, so its wrong to claim expe­ri­mental. The only thing left is for the FDA panel to vote on final approval.

  2. In the US, suicide is not payable until after the contract is in force for 2 years. After the second year, the insurer cannot deny a claim regard­less of suicide, while sane or insane. The death must occur within the first two years to be declined.

Kommentieren Sie den Artikel

Bitte geben Sie Ihren Kommentar ein!
Bitte geben Sie hier Ihren Namen ein