The human rights industry and crypto-reli­gious national – and trans­na­tional complex

Deut­sche Version: Hier 
 

The one-world hegemon also wants to play «Lord of Church»

Some say it, many feel it: Our world is facing the turn of an era. The prot­ago­nists of the old, but vanis­hing concept of globa­liza­tion, have openly admitted their failure by presen­ting their so-called „Great Re-Set“ as their recipe for brea­king the dead­lock. This may sound temp­ting to the crowds of the mass-elite society in the West, but it will be flatly rejected by the majo­rity of the 6.6 billion peoples of the non-West. For the latter it was not only risky, but life-threa­tening as well, to leave the required reor­ga­niza­tions or „fire­fighting works“ once more only to old arso­nists of the past.

The turn of an era curr­ently expe­ri­enced is about to replace the mono­polar colo­nial rule of the last 500 years to be replaced by a new multi­polar global order to over­come the old mass-elite system in addi­tion. In the new mill­en­nium we see the age of the old mari­time or colo­nial powers lite­rally go under before our eyes.

What had happened?

The one-world hegemon toge­ther with its colo­nial masters and bought-up elites have faced a huge problem from the outset: To fight against the growing majo­rity of masses to be subdued and over­come the ever-incre­asing oppon­ents. This could only be done with the help of supe­rior poli­tics, supe­rior orga­niza­tion and supe­rior tech­no­logy. However, this lead in know­ledge, orga­niza­tion and tech­no­logy has in the mean­while been melting away like ice under the sun. The feudal system of long-estab­lished pluto­cra­cies is going to encounter incre­asing pres­sure by the day.

The old days of mowing-down defen­ce­less popu­la­tions and poorly armed people with machine gunfire at will have passed: The struggle to achieve the surrender of tech­ni­cally equal conti­nental powers in the wake of the ‚Great War‘ (1914–1918) has been poin­ting in a diffe­rent direc­tion. In the mean­time, it seems to be impos­sible to successfully over­come mili­ta­rily the majo­rity-world-popu­la­tion of the 85%, which exists today outside the group of the so-called West.

To over­come their weak­ne­sses globa­lists have started early to apply methods for mono­po­liza­tions as well as the whole spec­trum of hybrid warfare against the growing forces of the oppo­sing rest. These methods include, namely:

• the instal­la­tion of trun­cated demo­cra­cies as protec­to­rates over­seen by a system of multi­party-olig­ar­chies under trans­na­tional control with the supposed sepa­ra­tion of of the execu­tive -, legis­la­tive – and judi­cial bran­ches of govern­ment cancelled due to collu­sion of the rele­vant front-actors through the back door.
• Aboli­tion of the sepa­ra­tion of church and state by means of the total state self-empowered for eccle­si­a­stic autho­rity. Such total state not only takes care of legis­la­tive proce­dures, but also claims the meta­phy­sical realm: It deter­mines and shapes so-called „values“ in the tempt­a­tion to „push“ ideo­logy on peoples as dogmas, which do not need to be explained.

The self-empowered state as reli­gious autho­rity, has finally peaked by clai­ming the crypto-reli­gion, called „Human Rights“: The reli­gious dimen­sion is able to furnish the one-world-hegemon with a special instru­ment to elegantly circum­vent any unplea­sant ques­tions in the wake of the extern­ally imposed march to his world domi­na­tion. Crypto-reli­gious dogmas have already served in the past, e.g. to deflect blatant viola­tions of the U.S. Consti­tu­tion, like: The „Mani­fest Destiny“ [divine mission state­ment coined exclu­si­vely for the U.S.] of the „City on the Hill“ [USA as the Jeru­salem 2.0] is going to defeat any earthly criti­cism and/or impo­si­tion due to legis­la­tion by crypto-reli­gious means!

Woodrow Wilson, master of the poli­tical-reli­gious agenda

Although a fairy tale from Thousand and One Nights tells, that Mrs. Eleanor Roose­velt had been the inventor of the „Human Rights“, better Woodrow Wilson should go down in the Atlantic impe­rial history as a model pupil of Henry VIII. as well as the pioneer of modern sacral endea­vours equal to a „Moses of the Human Rights“. At the end of World War I, his 14 „Commandments [Points]“ succeeded in persua­ding the German Impe­rial Navy and the Impe­rial Army to rebel against the German Emperor: This made it possible to disarm the II. German Empire blue-eyed under false pretences having it pulled over the table in order to put phase II [1933 – 1945] already on track in 1919 with the help of the peace-dictates of Versailles subse­quently. In the mean­time, the third and last phase [2015 – 2040] has been laun­ched and has entered its imple­men­ta­tion phase.

That histo­rical example shows what crypto-reli­gious initia­tives can achieve in God-forsaken socie­ties. It encou­raged poli­tico-secta­rians of the West to move on to the next big step after World War I. For best optics, US-First Lady, Mrs. Eleanor Roose­velt had been advanced as inno­cent looking PR- & Produc­tion Assistant respec­tively patro­ness for the „Reli­gious Works of Human Rights“  to be lifted to the supra­na­tional level with the UN in the after­math of WW2. This actually had been imple­mented in the course of the adop­tion of the so-called „Universal Human Rights“ by the United Nations in 1948.

Great pati­ence as charac­te­ristic of the perfect trap

The more perfectly a trap is set, the much later the cat jumps out of the bag. With regard to global gover­nance, this may take two or three gene­ra­tions. Profes­sional entrap­ment tends to be packed with extreme patience.

Regar­ding the change of objec­tives over time, the website of the United Nations explains to its readers by a „A Brief History of UN Human Rights“ full of pride:

„… The growth in size and acti­vi­ties of UN Human Rights has paral­leled the increase in the human rights machi­nery since the adop­tion of the Universal Decla­ra­tion of Human Rights in 1948. Drafted as „a common stan­dard of achie­ve­ment for all peoples and nations,“ the Decla­ra­tion for the first time in human history set out basic civil, poli­tical, economic, social and cultural rights that all human beings, without distinc­tion, should enjoy. Non-discri­mi­na­tion and equa­lity have been incre­asingly reaf­firmed as funda­mental prin­ci­ples of inter­na­tional human rights law and essen­tial elements of human dignity.

Today, the body of inter­na­tional human rights law conti­nues to expand and new human rights stan­dards are being built on the Universal Decla­ra­tion to address emer­ging human rights issues. In the 21^st century, UN Human Rights has helped achieve greater protec­tion of the rights of negle­cted popu­la­tion groups such as indi­ge­nous peoples, older people, people with disa­bi­li­ties, and people belon­ging to the LGBTI commu­nity. The Office has also brought to the fore the link between human rights and climate change.…»

Note: Emphasis by Unser-Mitteleuropa

Source: www.ohchr.org/en/about-us/brief-history-un-human-rights

The said „brief history“ of human rights in the words of the United Nations describes, that „the body of inter­na­tional human rights law conti­nues to expand and new human rights stan­dards are being built “ Mean­while, regar­ding „new“ issues that “the Office also brought to the fore“, we have mean­while reached the „LGBTI commu­nity“ and „climate change“: There, at the latest, the first alarm bells should start ring. Who would have seen coming such magic tricks, some 75 years ago?

Criti­cism of Pope Bene­dict XVI. (1927 – 2022)

The problem of „Universal Human Rights“ under the aegis of the United Nations Pope Bene­dict XVI. has brought to the point during a comme­mo­ra­tive event staged at the Vatican on December 10, 2018 at the occa­sion of the 60th anni­ver­sary of the mentioned UN document:

„The foun­da­tion on which the Universal Decla­ra­tion of Human Rights rests, will remain fragile if its ethical and divine origins are ignored,“ Pope Bene­dict said. Although much has been done in recent decades to promote and protect human rights throug­hout the world, „hundreds of millions of our brot­hers and sisters still see their rights to life, liberty and secu­rity threa­tened,“ the pope further explained.

It is clear that neither Catholic Church, nor Commu­ni­ties of the Islamic faith will ever ratify and sign such a profane reli­gious mani­festo. The Chris­tian and Islamic reli­gious commu­ni­ties – among them­selves for their total of 4.1 billion follo­wers world­wide – have been much better suited to do this on their own and outside of a secular insti­tu­tion, like the United Nations:

For example, Pope Francis and the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Ahmed el-Tayeb, signed the „Abu Dhabi Agree­ment“ or the „Docu­ment on the Brot­her­hood of All People for Peaceful Coexis­tence in the World“ in Abu Dhabi during a global confe­rence on Feb. 4, 2019.
Source: Here

It would be much more meaningful, if the govern­ments of the inter­na­tional commu­nity would concen­trate fully on the crea­tion and obser­vance of their partly very fragile secular legal appa­ra­tuses and leave the spiri­tual area without excep­tion to the world reli­gions: These are in Asia the ‚Three Teachings‘, such as Buddhism, Daoism and Confu­cia­nism, in the Orient Islam and Judaism, and in the Occi­dent Chris­tia­nity. Those world reli­gions have many thousand years of expe­ri­ence in answe­ring ques­tions about meta­phy­sics and ethics and are best quali­fied not to be confused and/or noto­riously seduced in their judgments by the fashion trends of the day, as it happens to our day-to-day-poli­ti­cians on almost daily basis.
A mix-up of church – and state matters faci­li­tates the tempt­a­tion to have contro­ver­sial or shoddy power poli­tics of the day re-packaged into fake-dogmas for better accep­tance from the outside and largely clue­less popu­la­tions. It turns even worse, if poli­tical forces take the bait to syste­ma­ti­cally abuse the basi­cally posi­tive idea of human rights insti­tu­tio­nally, but have it converted into a „Human Rights Industry“ run by poli­tical hypocrites.

The book: „The Human Rights Industry“ by Alfred de Zayas

Former Inde­pen­dent Expert on Inter­na­tional Order (2012 – 2018) at the UN and Fulbright scholar, Professor Alfred de Zayas has dedi­cated his latest book entitled „The Human Rights INDUSTRY“, published by Clarity Press in June 2023, to such misconduct.

Daniel Kovalik, Professor of Inter­na­tional Human Rights at the Univer­sity of Pitts­burgh School of Law and himself author of „No More War: How the West Violates Inter­na­tional Law by Using „Huma­ni­ta­rian“ Inter­ven­tion to Advance Economic and Stra­tegic Inte­rests“ comm­ents on the new book of Alfred de Zayas:

„This book is long-overdue critique of the human rights system by someone who truly values human rights and who has a unique and valuable perspec­tive as a human rights prac­ti­tioner for 50 years. As de Zayas so eloquently explains, the human rights system has sadly become a busi­ness, moti­vated by the drive for the appr­oval of its rich and self-inte­rested (Western) patrons. The result is a system infected by unfair­ness and double stan­dards – the very oppo­site of what we want of a system which purports to protect the most basic rights of huma­nity. However, this is not a fata­li­stic or cynical critique like some. Rather, it is a hopeful work which offers cons­truc­tive criti­cism and concrete sugges­tions for making the system one that works for ever­yone and upholds the very values it was created to promote. I highly recom­mend this book for experts, prac­ti­tio­ners, and lay readers alike.“

 Jeffrey D. Sachs, professor at Columbia Univer­sity notes on the same topic:

„Alfred de Zayas offers us an inva­luable insider‚s account of how the global system created after World War II to protect human rights is brazenly mani­pu­lated by the United States Govern­ment and others for geopo­li­tical ends. De Zayas is a human rights leader of remar­kable insight, expe­ri­ence, wisdom, and inte­grity, whose account is both searing and hugely cons­truc­tive. He makes vividly clear what we must, and how we can, truly cham­pion peace and human rights.“

A proposal to the UN from a propo­nent of genuine sepa­ra­tion of powers by the author of this treatise

In the spirit of the above-mentioned profes­sors, a simple but highly effec­tive recom­men­da­tion could be derived from the current misuse by the „Human Rights Industry“ under the High Commis­sion of the UN General Assembly:

„Each member state of the UN Human Rights is entitled only to publicly self-accuse itself about own human rights viola­tions as well as laying out the pros­pect of appro­priate self-reme­dial measures for that purpose. Member States are not entitled to lodge their complaints about alleged miscon­duct if other states.“

Such a self-disci­pli­ning of hege­monic states gone wild would serve to effec­tively put an overdue final stop to the abuse of the instru­ment of Human Rights for poli­tical purposes in the future.

Case study from the realm of the «Human Rights Industry» with a spell of the script thanks to the „GRETA effect“

Western spin doctors prefer to dele­gate their crypto-reli­gious indoc­tri­na­tions supposed to be addressed to the distracted masses of an other­wise mate­ria­li­stic indus­trial society, to young female talking-dolls as their loudspeakers:

The selected candi­dates are either drawn from the pool of poten­tial actresses or from the range of special „mino­ri­ties“. The latter often include so-called „migrant women“ and even minors with or without heredi­tary cogni­tive defects:

For example, Greta, an autistic underage girl from Sweden who has since made it to world fame, at the tender age of 16, succeeded to espe­ci­ally delight high-ranking guests and CEO’s at the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2019 with her antics for an uncon­di­tional hysteria in the face of the supposed threat due to climate change.

Espe­ci­ally since the United States have openly clas­si­fied China as their grea­test stra­tegic threat, the latter and its allies have already laun­ched an infor­ma­tion – and economic war against China, addi­tio­nally supported by the Human Rights Industry in the run-up to a hot war.

In this crusade of the West, a so-called human rights acti­vist from China must not be missing, of course: The young lady was quickly found, albeit in faraway Australia. It is Vicky Xu, who was born in Jiayu­guan City, Gansu in China in 1994 and began her studies in Beijing in 2012, but swit­ched to Australia in 2014 at the tender age of 20 to study poli­tical science at Melbourne Univer­sity – inclu­ding an exch­ange semester at the Harry S. Truman Rese­arch Insti­tute – and graduated in 2018.

Even during those early days, Vicky Xu, the young talent was already working for Austra­lian and US media and last but not least as a stand-up come­dian, combi­ning black humour with her fanta­sies from China or maybe just with the infor­ma­tion she might have received from Western intel­li­gence services. Xu left China while she was still a teen­ager and underage student. It raises the ques­tion what personal impres­sions of poli­tical nature she could have had received from China other than child­hood memo­ries and expe­ri­ences from her school desks?

After studying in Australia, Vicky Xu went through a mira­cu­lously blitz-career: She has worked for the Austra­lian Broad­cas­ting Corpo­ra­tion (ABC), The New York Times, and even the Austra­lian think tank Austra­lian Stra­tegic Policy Insti­tute (ASPI). In March 2020, Vicky Xu’s high-alti­tude career culmi­nated in being named lead author of the report „Uyghurs for Sale,“ which agitates against China’s mino­rity poli­cies toward the Uyghurs.

The narra­tive covered by this report has actually been geared to make the West’s economic sanc­tions against China publicly more accep­table, packaged by the toolkit «Human Rights».

It raises the ques­tion how economic sanc­tions per se, which in plain language repre­sent nothing else than a form of economic warfare, can contri­bute to the better­ment of local or Chinese popu­la­tions, but possibly had been desi­gned from the very begin­ning to cause destruc­tion in disgu­ised form of warfare against China only?

It seems that Western country elites in their global war frenzy have unmasked them­selves as the enemies of the remai­ning 85 percent of the world population!

***

A contri­bu­tion of UNSER-MITTELEUOPA Global Research

---

Bitte unter­stützen Sie unseren Kampf für Frei­heit und Bürgerrechte.
Für jede Spende (PayPal oder Bank­über­wei­sung) ab € 10.- erhalten Sie als Danke­schön auf Wunsch ein Dutzend Aufkleber „CORONA-DIKTATUR? NEIN DANKE“ porto­frei und gratis! Details hier.

---

---